[Note: I keep starting things that make me think I'm supposed to cover all of my thoughts about whatever I write. Since I stopped using wordpress, I have no idea how long these posts run and have yet to check the word count. I might expand this post later as it ties into essays and research I've worked on before, apologies in advance if it ends abruptly.]
Here's where outreach and marketing overlap in my opinion--and why I believe outreach is the superior concept to marketing, though with all due respect to marketers, I believe both are still important and useful. Both operate on transdisciplinary principles of design--particularly through communication.
{continued after the jump}
{continued after the jump}
An organization or individual (the entity initiating the marketing/outreach) conceives a desire and/or need among audiences/consumers. The conceiver(s) communicate the existence of their product(s) and/or services to the audience/consumers--this is the most visible part of the marketing and outreach--and ideally deliver or facilitate some connection between the desired good/service (plus a new sub-category: experience) and audience/consumer.
In most capitalistic arenas, marketing strives to stimulate and serve desires for some kind of product. In the buzz I'm reading from this admittedly narrow cross section of the marketing community, the best tangible way to justify product hustling is to give something that's well beyond the value of the product--it's the experience and story which potentially shapes the identity of its consumer that makes it worthwhile. Apple is a commonly cited "experience" brand. Indeed, I've friends who are downright upset about the hardware, software, and interface about the actual products.
Outreach in non-profit circles, which normally focus on meeting needs (though sometimes takes on the guise of marketing to simply promote awareness about an organization's existence), ought to be driven to communicate the availability, accessibility, relevance, and/or significance of a good, service, and/or experience.
In most capitalistic organizations I can imagine, marketing a service means that a company may provide the things you need for the experience (think skydiving), but I'm drawing a blank about how they'd market an experience. Experiences are used to market goods all the time though.
Outreach marketing (think AdCouncil PSA marketing) is a bit different. The experience benefits people in ways that are not monetizable. It's about good lifestyle choices, spending time with the kids, etc.
Where does propaganda fall into this spectrum? ...
Interestingly, fostering identity is intrinsic to good leadership too (for scholarly backing to this claim, see The New Psychology of Leadership borrow it from a University Library network, it's priced like a textbook around $90, there are other things I could point to also, but I'm not essaying with my strict scholar's hat at this time). In this writing, we're now entering the bigger picture of collective social behavior.
Sources: "Sell an experience, not a product".
Sources: "Sell an experience, not a product".
"Marketing needs more polymaths"
http://www.thedrum.co.uk/opinion/2012/05/16/marketing-needs-more-polymaths-more-magic-please-underpinned-logic
http://www.thedrum.co.uk/opinion/2012/05/16/marketing-needs-more-polymaths-more-magic-please-underpinned-logic
No comments:
Post a Comment